|
Saturday July 11, 2009 - 2:56 PM
I t was true to the book, you rarely see this in cinema, but Robert Langdon is suppose to be sexy, smart and sort of a rico suave...I just can't imagine Tom Hanks in this roll, although he's a great actor.
Saturday June 20, 2009 - 9:43 PM
anyone who actually read and enjoyed the book will probably not enjoy this movie. it's like ron howard just used the book as a loose idea, grabbed a few facts to add credibility....and then just reshot the whole story.
the characters aren't portrayed properly....the story line is way off from the original book....i dunno, it just seemed way to thrown together. id seriously like to see this redone, but kept true to the original storyline.
Friday June 19, 2009 - 9:41 AM
only because the book was awesome.
i agree that Ewan does not fit the part.
definitely does not!
Thursday June 18, 2009 - 1:06 AM
i personally really liked it.
it was what i expected it to be.
and i also liked that they didnt change much from how the book was...since they tend to do that to movies a lot.
Wednesday June 17, 2009 - 4:32 PM
Garbage!
in my opinion shitty ass movie, pretty boring, a little predictable, Ewan McGregor does not fit the role to play a high priest, and Tom Hanks acting ability has really gone down the drain, if he ever had any. A lot of his newer characters all seem very similar. Basically I could have walked out of the movie and not cared how it ended.
Tuesday June 16, 2009 - 10:25 PM
I liked it.
I liked the twists, the acting was good.
I mean by no means was it something extraordinary but it was like the first. Entertaining.
Tuesday May 26, 2009 - 2:34 PM
Loved it, the acting was consistantly good.
The plot was complex enough to stay interesting, but simple enough for a mainstream audience.
I never saw The Da Vinci Code, but this makes me really want to.
|
7 reviews